SnuRRe Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 When I'm using torrents from different trackers in utorrent, I'd like to have some grouping to make it easier to see what torrents is for each tracker.I know Azureus have this feature.That would be very nice Edit:By the way, country flags should be changed for nextgentel.com users to norwegian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrS Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 That's what I miss the most in µTorrent: sorting torrents (the way I want it). (I could care less about seeing what was added last for example.)I'm not talking about giving them a priority number, assuming that's what the current # column does. (I simply force start torrents myself.)I'd like:1] to be able to move all torrents up and down, at the moment that's only possible for qued and downloading torrents. 2] a (optional) tracker column displaying the tracker url (or first part of it) 3] a (optional) custom column where you can label a torrent. 1] is found in many clients, 2] and 3] in Azureus.1] combined with 2] (or 3]) enables grouping torrents by tracker.I would use 3] to add a label showing the tracker, so if 2] is implemented, 3] would be obsolete for me. Although for some people, even then it will be usefull, organizing torrents by content for example or distinguishing torrents they've uploaded themself from other torrents.As these features just give more options displaying the torrents and are all optional (just turn those columns off if you don't need them) I can't think of any arguements against them.I know nothing about programming, but I don't think those features are hard to implement or consume much memory and CPU (if any). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TechNiko Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 [1] To be able to move all torrents up and down.[3] a (optional) custom column where you can label a torrent. Either of these would be VERY welcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keloran Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 2 is proberlly the only one needed (for this request), becasue then you would just order by that column,personally i woudlnt need this, but i can see how it would be useful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.