simmy Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 Hello folks!!!Here's the situation - I've read a thread here on limiting connections, speeds, etc. based on my upload speed so I've limited seeding to 400KB/s. Well I was wondering - is it possible to make it so that if say 1 torrent can reach that speed to not seed any others?Why I'm asking this is because if I only seed 1 torrent the connections/peers for it will be less (most likely) plus the HDD will probably have to jump across data less so it seems like a better option than having 14 torrents seeding at like 20KB/s each.Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Switeck Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 That's an unusually fast upload. Is that a fiber optic line?It is not possible to make uTorrent only seed the minimum number of torrents to reach max speed...while still allowing it to start more. The don't count slow speed features buried in advanced settings only work for very low speeds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simmy Posted November 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Thanks for the comments Switeck!Yes, it's a fiber optic line and it used to upload even faster but they limited the speed to about 500-550 KB/s, although in the terms it says that my upload speed would match the download one and I've been thinking for some time to go and see why they can't deliver on their promise.As for the feature itself - do you think it's worth submitting it as feature request somewhere? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Switeck Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 It's probably already been asked before (since 2005).Better torrent handling is supposed to be done by later uTorrent versions...so the developers may slip something in like this even without another feature request. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.