maku8ex Posted January 1, 2007 Report Share Posted January 1, 2007 i'm getting a new comp, which i plan to keep separately for torrents, serving etc.Its gonna have 4 GB RAM & a SATA 1.5 drive.i'm gonna keep it connected to a 100 mbit dedicated line, my question is will the SATA drive be able to handle all that bandwidth?The dl/ul speeds for a 100 mbit are ~12MB/s, can the drive handle that (& will i be able to use the comp at the same time?)some ppl say that at speeds like that, the PC lags like hell & its virtually unusable.server owners/l337s help me out here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Switeck Posted January 2, 2007 Report Share Posted January 2, 2007 Depends alot on how big the drive's cache is. If it's 2 MB...there's going to be all kinds of slowdowns. If it's 16 MB or larger, it shouldn't be as bad...if at all!Also it depends on whether you're running optimized SATA drivers for your motherboard or add-on controller. If it's an add-on controller, just remember that it'll be putting a BIG load on your PCI slots (which are all shared bandwidth). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBear Posted January 2, 2007 Report Share Posted January 2, 2007 I wouldn't consider that speed without a RAID w/parity or similar drive array. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Shroud Posted January 2, 2007 Report Share Posted January 2, 2007 A raid won't do much if it's ATA-100 hard drives. So the question is what is the hard drive setup? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Switeck Posted January 2, 2007 Report Share Posted January 2, 2007 You could possibly increase µTorrent's RAM cache size to something ridiculous and get it to work ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maku8ex Posted January 3, 2007 Author Report Share Posted January 3, 2007 well the drive's specs are as follows: FORMATTED CAPACITY (GB) __________________80 ACTUATOR TYPE ____________________________VOICE COIL CYLINDERS __PHYSICAL______________________ HEADS ______PHYSICAL______________________2 DISCS (3.5 in) ___________________________1 MEDIA TYPE _______________________________THIN FILM HEAD TYPE ________________________________GMR RECORDING METHOD _________________________EPRML 16/17 ZBR INTERNAL TRANSFER RATE (Mbytes/sec) ______up to 85.4 SUSTAINED TRANSFER RATE (MB/sec)__________up to 58 EXTERNAL TRANSFER RATE (Mbytes/sec) ______up to 150 PIO/DMA/UDMA MODE (max) __________________4/2/6 SPINDLE SPEED (RPM) ______________________7200 AVERAGE LATENCY (mSEC) ___________________4.16 BUFFER ___________________________________8MBcan it take the load?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Switeck Posted January 4, 2007 Report Share Posted January 4, 2007 If that's all the drive is doing, technically it should be ABLE to...however it also depends on whether you're running multiple torrents at once and whether you're seeding+downloading from the same drive. Even whether the data falls closer to the outer edge of the drive's spindle (where it has higher velocities at the same RPM) can make a huge difference in what it can sustain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted January 4, 2007 Report Share Posted January 4, 2007 Hm, location on the drive platter affecting things is a bit of a stretch (though possible, I suppose). The only thing I can say is, set an insanely large cache size (256MB? 512MB?) and disable all cache settings besides "Enable caching of disk writes" and "Enable caching of disk reads," then test ;\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maku8ex Posted January 4, 2007 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2007 @Switeck: yeah i'll be doing ALL of that, multiple torrents, & yeah i'll be dling/uling to the same drive@Ultima: 256MB 512MB?? dont ppl say that a cache above 32MB is overkill? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted January 4, 2007 Report Share Posted January 4, 2007 Those were recommendations for the old cache system -- µTorrent makes more effective use of the disk cache now. Honestly, I don't even bother setting this number myself, so I'm not 100% sure how you should set it. If you're unsure, then all I can say is "trial and error" with that number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Switeck Posted January 4, 2007 Report Share Posted January 4, 2007 Location on the disk spindle makes a bit more difference than you might think. Even on the best of drives, typically the outer edge can be accessed at 2x the speed of the inner edge...and it may even be 3-4x faster. However these are linear speeds reading beginning to end, not jumping around like a torrent reading/writing small chunks all over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.