kryogenix Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 I was using Azureus as my primary client. I will use this until I notice I am missing certain features or performance. But for the moment, utorrent will be my primary client. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raan Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 Yeah, I was using Azuerus too. Feels good to see the mem usage stay around 2MB rather than up towards 80MB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregschoen Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 I went from bitTornado (I was young and stupid once), to Azureus (I still have nightmares of 80000k Mem usage) to BitComet (Only a little better then Az) finally to uTorrent.As far as I'm concerned, as soon as RSS feeds are supported, no other BT clients exist, or have ever existed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eva.02 Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 I was using Azureus along with the official mainline client for when I wanted to seed and play games etc. Won't need either anymore though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnappyCrunch Posted September 23, 2005 Report Share Posted September 23, 2005 Azureus for me. I was seriously thinking about buying more RAM, 'cause 512MB wasn't cutting it with Azureus around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YeCkeL Posted September 23, 2005 Report Share Posted September 23, 2005 I just started using this client Azureus is still my primary client. I do like this on might have to go on my usb drive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
segosa Posted September 23, 2005 Report Share Posted September 23, 2005 I started with Azureus, then due to resources, I went to BitComet, but that decided it was going to kill my internet connection whenever it was running, so I'm happy to have a client with all its functionality (uTorrent) that doesn't do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremy of Many Posted September 23, 2005 Report Share Posted September 23, 2005 BitCometUntil this program has the DHT feature and pre-allocates all disk space for the entire torrent, I'll stick to BitComet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grimman Posted September 23, 2005 Report Share Posted September 23, 2005 BitComet, and I was pretty happy with it... apart from the fact that it just wouldn't rehash, EVER... and it needed it, cause sometimes it'd just leave out a small part of the torrent. Rarely, but it happened and that pretty much warrants a re-hash function. Oh, and sometimes when I was closing BitComet down it'd hang, using 100% of my CPU. ;P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kejsarn Posted September 23, 2005 Report Share Posted September 23, 2005 Azuerus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandy Posted September 23, 2005 Report Share Posted September 23, 2005 BitComet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rokushiki Posted September 23, 2005 Report Share Posted September 23, 2005 used bitcomet and azureus b4.azureus takes up too much resources compared to this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordtinuviel Posted September 23, 2005 Report Share Posted September 23, 2005 azureus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 23, 2005 Report Share Posted September 23, 2005 Let's say that in terms of efficience (dl speed), the only client was (even if no more updated & buggy) BT++ ; in the very past I use that one.And since it does not support udp trackers & multiple files in torrents, I switched to Bitcomet.As someone stated here, it could be great if utorrent may unleash the power of dht. I wait longer to see what will happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 23, 2005 Report Share Posted September 23, 2005 The official client for me... I'm going to try µTorrent for a few days at least, because I dig it I hope that the few problems I have noticed will disappear soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 23, 2005 Report Share Posted September 23, 2005 Azureus. utorrent beats it hands down - it's just soooo good!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yinchie Posted September 24, 2005 Report Share Posted September 24, 2005 I used to use Azureus for a very very long time.After trying out uTorrent, I won't be using Azureus anymore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 24, 2005 Report Share Posted September 24, 2005 I was abused by Azureus. Good ridance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanky Posted September 25, 2005 Report Share Posted September 25, 2005 Azuerus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BILZE Posted September 25, 2005 Report Share Posted September 25, 2005 I used bitcomet but then i had a hardware crash and i must use an older Pc...so i used zip torrent which requires a very low cpu and memory usage...but now i use µtorrrent it is much greater....sorry i´m german. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YeCkeL Posted September 25, 2005 Report Share Posted September 25, 2005 Let's say that in terms of efficience (dl speed), the only client was (even if no more updated & buggy) BT++ ; in the very past I use that one.And since it does not support udp trackers & multiple files in torrents, I switched to Bitcomet.As someone stated here, it could be great if utorrent may unleash the power of dht. I wait longer to see what will happens.Your a bastard for using BT++ after the devlopment stoped you hurt net works Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 26, 2005 Report Share Posted September 26, 2005 Your a bastard for using BT++ after the devlopment stoped you hurt net works [OT]BT++ is not stopped, just 'on hold' by the author itself, which claims that BT++ new release will be released soon (november?).[/OT]Thanks for give me the qualify of bastard: that's the most useless, pointless comment i've ever seen here since you dont know the facts. Sayonara! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Borisz Posted September 26, 2005 Report Share Posted September 26, 2005 I used Bittornado. tried Azureus maybe once and hated it. I don't have Java installed anyway (its too bloated).I'm switching from Bittornado because it used too much RAM (20+mb per window) and with 10+ windows open it clogged up the screen. utorrent seems the best alternative so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eisa01 Posted September 26, 2005 Report Share Posted September 26, 2005 BitComet, utorrent has all the features I'll ever need Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 26, 2005 Report Share Posted September 26, 2005 I used arcitc and azurues, this client looks incredible.! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.