_hunter Posted May 3, 2015 Report Posted May 3, 2015 Greetings, Some time age (several years) uTorrent already had this bug: left without monitoring for a few hours it devours all available physical memory. Now (after I upgraded from 3.4.2 to 3.4.3.40097) I see it again (01.jpg). Why I'm blaming uTorrent? -- Because right after I'm closing it (02.jpg) all consumed memory returned back (03.jpg)So whatever you did in 3.4.3 -- please undo it back. Best regards...
DreadWingKnight Posted May 3, 2015 Report Posted May 3, 2015 Why are you not showing the utorrent.exe process in these screenshots?Oh right, because it's not using the 9gb of ram you claim it is.
_hunter Posted May 3, 2015 Author Report Posted May 3, 2015 What do you mean "not showing the utorrent.exe process in these screenshots"? -- Did you ever looked on first-one?>>> Oh right, because it's not using the 9gb of ram you claim it is.Actually I not really care if it's "using" it or "causes it to be consumed": 3 hours passed after I restarted uTorrent -- and 8GB occupied. Right after I closed it again -- all that memory is free. The only thing that was changed in system -- uTorrent's version.So you're totally right -- uTorrent isn't my guy -- he was framed.
DreadWingKnight Posted May 3, 2015 Report Posted May 3, 2015 None of your three screenshots show the utorrent.exe process.Nevermind the fact that uTorrent WILL crash if the utorrent process uses more than 2GB of ram.EVERY TIME
_hunter Posted May 3, 2015 Author Report Posted May 3, 2015 Do you see it now? -- I outlined it with thick red lines... And again: I'm not saying that utorrent.exe process devours all memory, what I'm saying that right after I statring new (3.4.3) version of uTorrent -- "someone" starts to consume physical memory, and right after I'm closing uTorrent -- all consumed memory returned back.So, how they're saying: "If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then ..."
DreadWingKnight Posted May 3, 2015 Report Posted May 3, 2015 uTorrent is only using 143mb in the second screenshot.So yeah, it's windows' disk cache stupidity AGAIN.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.