GCRaistlin Posted December 13, 2011 Report Share Posted December 13, 2011 rafiWin2k3 R2 Std x86 / WD20EARS. Yes, I restarted - not just uT, server too. The issue is here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgwaste Posted December 14, 2011 Report Share Posted December 14, 2011 some interesting info posted by 'demonzon' regarding the RSS issue. uTorrent staff can thisbe addresses and fixed?--------------------For some reason utorrent sends Content-Length: 0 in its GET request. lighttpd does not accept this.For example, TPBs High Def TV Shows requests are requested (in utorrent) as this:GET /208 HTTP/1.1Host: rss.thepiratebay.orgUser-Agent: BTWebClient/3100(26595)Accept-Encoding: gzipConnection: CloseContent-Length: 0The "Content-Length: 0" is not valid in a HTTP GET request. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamK Posted December 14, 2011 Report Share Posted December 14, 2011 some interesting info posted by 'demonzon' regarding the RSS issue. uTorrent staff can thisbe addresses and fixed?--------------------For some reason utorrent sends Content-Length: 0 in its GET request. lighttpd does not accept this.For example, TPBs High Def TV Shows requests are requested (in utorrent) as this:GET /208 HTTP/1.1Host: rss.thepiratebay.orgUser-Agent: BTWebClient/3100(26595)Accept-Encoding: gzipConnection: CloseContent-Length: 0The "Content-Length: 0" is not valid in a HTTP GET request.Thanks for the info. I'll attempt to reproduce this bug, and update you tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted December 14, 2011 Report Share Posted December 14, 2011 some interesting info posted by 'demonzon' regarding the RSS issue. uTorrent staff can thisbe addresses and fixed?--------------------For some reason utorrent sends Content-Length: 0 in its GET request. lighttpd does not accept this.For example' date=' TPBs High Def TV Shows requests are requested (in utorrent) as this:GET /208 HTTP/1.1Host: rss.thepiratebay.orgUser-Agent: BTWebClient/3100(26595)Accept-Encoding: gzipConnection: CloseContent-Length: 0The "Content-Length: 0" is not valid in a HTTP GET request.[/quote']Thanks for the info. I'll attempt to reproduce this bug, and update you tomorrow.I wonder if this is the reason for this RSS issue here as well: http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=624582#p624582rafiWin2k3 R2 Std x86 / WD20EARS. Yes, I restarted - not just uT, server too. The issue is here.maybe uT on Win2k3 has specific issues Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zarggg Posted December 14, 2011 Report Share Posted December 14, 2011 I haven't been really following development lately, so I was wondering if the piece checking (when using "Force Re-check") had any major changes.I have a couple large torrents (>5GB, one is nearly a terabyte) that I only have partially downloaded (for bandwidth and disk storage reasons), and whenever I try to do a recheck on them, they cause uTorrent to become non-responsive and I sometimes have to kill the process. Does anyone know what's going on here?Edit: I should add that the non-responsiveness does not occur in 3.0.OS is Windows 7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GCRaistlin Posted December 14, 2011 Report Share Posted December 14, 2011 maybe uT on Win2k3 has specific issues Specific issues introduced in version 3? Version 2 works OK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted December 14, 2011 Report Share Posted December 14, 2011 I suppose so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GCRaistlin Posted December 14, 2011 Report Share Posted December 14, 2011 Then I'd like to ask developers - isn't it possible to rollback changes in working with cache? Sounds silly, yeah... But I believe such issues should have high priority in to-be-fixed list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamK Posted December 14, 2011 Report Share Posted December 14, 2011 I have verified this bug. I'm fixing it now - it will be in the next changelog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted December 14, 2011 Report Share Posted December 14, 2011 I have verified this bug. I'm fixing it now - it will be in the next changelog.Was it really Win2K3 related ? Or something potentially common to other platforms ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dyep Posted December 14, 2011 Report Share Posted December 14, 2011 What is the changelog for build 26606? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC1984 Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 No idea whats going on here, UI exploded. Even my damn taskbar. Picture of my full desktop, not counting the black boxes.Torrent with a hundred or so vids in it, clicked stream and this. Seems like the pick a video dialogue box is bugged, reproducible but doesnt happen every time. Windows xp, ut build 26595Firon harangued me into making this account to post this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SergoSP Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 This version will be performed x64 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 What is the changelog for build 26606?what r u talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamK Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 Then I'd like to ask developers - isn't it possible to rollback changes in working with cache? Sounds silly, yeah... But I believe such issues should have high priority in to-be-fixed list.Hi Raistlin,Yes, it is definitely possible - in fact, we already rolled back some changes that caused the hashfail crashes in 26591 & 26593. We just want to understand any issues before we roll back code, and unfortunately, the disk cache subsystem is one of the harder areas to test. Not even our best testers saw the issue before it appeared in the wild.We're going to work with you, osmosis & rafi to track the remaining issues down.Thanks,Adam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamK Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 I have verified this bug. I'm fixing it now - it will be in the next changelog.Was it really Win2K3 related ? Or something potentially common to other platforms ?I'm sorry' date=' Rafi; I was referring to [url']http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=625094#p625094the "Content-Length" / RSS bug - that is the bug that is fixed.We're not ready to tackle the (remaining) disk cache / disk overloaded issues yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 Great! RSS is much more important than disk-cache ... for me... Anyways, Win2K3 is not a very common uT platform...BTW, RSS seems to work OK in 3.01 http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=625308#p625308 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dyep Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 What is the changelog for build 26606?what r u talking about?If you go to http://www.utorrent.com/downloads you will see that it shows December 14, 2011. Earlier today, they had build 26606 on the download page and they didn't post a changelog. And instead of them posting one they just reverted the build number back to 26595. Is it too much to ask for a changelog as soon as a new build number is up? I remember people complaining about this same exact thing months ago. Admin and staff, please get on top of things and post a changelog as soon as a new build is up for download so we don't have to ask everytime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamK Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 What is the changelog for build 26606?what r u talking about?If you go to http://www.utorrent.com/downloads you will see that it shows December 14' date=' 2011. Earlier today, they had build 26606 on the download page and they didn't post a changelog. And instead of them posting one they just reverted the build number back to 26595. Is it too much to ask for a changelog as soon as a new build number is up? I remember people complaining about this same exact thing months ago. Admin and staff, please get on top of things and post a changelog as soon as a new build is up for download so we don't have to ask everytime.[/quote']I think you may have seen a misplaced release for another product.There was no 26606 for utorrent. We apologize for the inconvenience . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dyep Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 what r u talking about?If you go to http://www.utorrent.com/downloads you will see that it shows December 14' date=' 2011. Earlier today, they had build 26606 on the download page and they didn't post a changelog. And instead of them posting one they just reverted the build number back to 26595. Is it too much to ask for a changelog as soon as a new build number is up? I remember people complaining about this same exact thing months ago. Admin and staff, please get on top of things and post a changelog as soon as a new build is up for download so we don't have to ask everytime.[/quote']I think you may have seen a misplaced release for another product.There was no 26606 for utorrent. We apologize for the inconvenience .Oh ok, was just wondering because it was up in the morning then gone when I got back to check. Thanks for clearing that up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GCRaistlin Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 Great! RSS is much more important than disk-cache ... for me... Anyways, Win2K3 is not a very common uT platform...I believe that's a joke. Disk cache is less important than RSS? For BitTorrent client? Great... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 I believe that's a joke.Yes But ... I said "for me" ... Since the cache works on Win 7 with my settings... I suggest you upgrade to Win2K8 ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masca90020 Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 I have a dilemma. If I check the "Disable Windows caching of disk writes", my download speed does not go over 1 mb/s (I have 100 mbps). If I let it unchecked, then I have mini-hangs. What's the middle ground here ? Also, the RSS feature is still broken. Maybe you can rollback to uT 2.2.1 RSS code. That worked fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 What's the middle ground here ? try 4M buffer size as in here : http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=622260#p622260What are "mini hangs" ? what system/HD ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masca90020 Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 It hangs when I remove a torrent or when I use right click etc. Not always, but it's annoying. The hangs usually keep 2-3 seconds. I have windows 7 ultimate x64, q9550 and 4 GB of RAM.If it's unchecked, my download speeds are fine. But if it's unchecked, mini hangs surface. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.