emc Posted December 7, 2005 Report Posted December 7, 2005 Why is shown client BitSpirit in uTorrent Peers window as Fake BitComet?BitSpirithttp://www.167bt.com/intl/emc
Redleer Posted December 7, 2005 Report Posted December 7, 2005 some bitcomet user mayby tryes to fake hes client as bitspirit.
emc Posted December 7, 2005 Author Report Posted December 7, 2005 some bitcomet user maybe tries to fake his client as bitspiritno, noI'll explain it:in our tracker there isn't allowed BitComet client (mistakes in statistics),more peers changed it to BitSpiritreal: peers use BitSpirit client (no patch)uTorrent peers window: shown Fake BitComet
chaosblade Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 Perheps BitSpirit uses the same style of peerids (as the FAKED bitcomets).I have no idea how BitSpirit shows its ID (and that client has BUILT IN id spoofing, which is very, VERY, V E R Y bad).
meltingsmoke Posted December 18, 2005 Report Posted December 18, 2005 BitSpirit is very much like BitComet, almost copied in features in looks. So the question is does BitSpirit share the same flaws as BitComet? Do trackers need to ban it too?
HoochieMamma Posted December 18, 2005 Report Posted December 18, 2005 Well if it has some sort of id spoofing implementation build it, I would say it's a given to ban it.PS: Your sig is cool. 1st: Same as me, never once. Only restarts caused by beta software. 2nd: So true, port forwarding is so important. Nearly as important as using Peerguardian while downloading.
Nefarious Posted December 18, 2005 Report Posted December 18, 2005 so, it's better to use peerguardian when downloading or should i stick to ipfilter.dat?
Ultima Posted December 18, 2005 Report Posted December 18, 2005 I personally would opt for PeerGuardian if I wanted to block any IPs.
chaosblade Posted December 18, 2005 Report Posted December 18, 2005 It seems BitSpirit does have similar peerid as the faked bitcomet clients. One might even guess that the faked scheme came FROM bitspirit in the first place.
Firon Posted December 18, 2005 Report Posted December 18, 2005 They use the same exact spoofing scheme, and both are Chinese leecher clients...They both behave horribly (patched or not).I wouldn't doubt it.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.