SanctimoniousApe Posted January 14, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 14, 2006 Interesting - are tehre any other similarities between us? Are you using the same settings and/or an ipfilter.dat list of significant size, perhaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boo Posted January 14, 2006 Report Share Posted January 14, 2006 SanctimoniousApe, try this:First use this beta, see if you have any problems with it:http://www.utorrent.com/download/beta/utorrent-1.3.1-beta-build-380.exeThen switch to this beta and see if you have any problems with it:http://www.utorrent.com/download/beta/utorrent-1.3.1-beta-build-382.exe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avatarl Posted January 14, 2006 Report Share Posted January 14, 2006 I usually have PeerGuardian open, and also have a small (about 120000 entries in utorrent) personal ipfilter, cause apparently PG blocked a few trackers for some reason, so I needed to disable it until those torrents were done.I used Speed Wizard, changed some connections (currently have 2/2 global/download torrents running, 200 total connections and 100 per torrent), changed upload from 22 to 20, that worked a bit, gained a more steady higher speed but it's still 60 AT MOST.Port forwarding works ok, and I haven't patched the SP2 TCP limit, though I highly doubt this is the problem. Speed doesn't go beyond 50-60kbs/s no matter how many hours it is downloading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted January 14, 2006 Report Share Posted January 14, 2006 avatarl: try patching it just in case.You can permanent-allow a tracker IP you know, I've done it before. Just right click on it on the PG2 window and choose "allow permanently" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avatarl Posted January 14, 2006 Report Share Posted January 14, 2006 Well, I could live without it being in perm allow, I get multiple IP blocks when connecting to that tracker and I'm not willing to add all of them in perm allow Um, from what I understand, the TCP limit limits connections at a time to 10, meaning that something will reach higher speeds slower than before, but it has to speed up eventually, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllWeasel Posted January 15, 2006 Report Share Posted January 15, 2006 Um, from what I understand, the TCP limit limits connections at a time to 10, meaning that something will reach higher speeds slower than before, but it has to speed up eventually, right?The limit is how many *unfinished* connection requests are pending at any given time. This can have a nasty effect when your browser, your 5 pop mail accounts and your BT client are all trying to open one or two TCP connections. They all have to wait for a shot at those 10 slots and that means waiting for a timeout AND fighting all the other apps waiting for those timeouts or connects too.I patched mine to 100 because I run some other connection-intense applications - 50 should be plenty for most people. It sure smoothed-out the browser action while the BT client was busy. I upgraded to XP from windows 2K and I was horrified by the dragging-ass TCP behavior. Luckily, I found the patch and it solved the problems. I concur with Firon and suggest you patch it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avatarl Posted January 15, 2006 Report Share Posted January 15, 2006 Oh well, it was probably few seeds... I did use the patch, I was getting about 70+ in one well seeded torrent plus some 10-15 in another, so I guess the total is more or less ok. Although I can't say if the TCP patch was responsible, my browser IS behaving better now in terms of speed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.