eboris Posted January 20, 2006 Report Share Posted January 20, 2006 I'm new to all of this, but saw the following messages on another site, and wondered whether it indicates a problem of some kind with utorrent. Each paragraph was a separate message from the same guy."seeding two files both of which have utorrent (don't knowhow to type the special u symbol) amongst the clientslisted in azureus. azureus is showing no figures from anyof them. exactly the same as it does with bit comet. so isutorrent as good as people say? if azureus says i'm notgetting anything back from these utorrent people, should ijust kick them off?""by "getting back" i mean what azereus tells me they arecontributing to the stream. the five utorrent users allregister as zip. of 118 people connected almost 90 areusing bit comet or bit lord. to be on the safe side i'veblocked utorrent too. only azureus and mainline until i getan explanation why none of the utorrent users register ascontributing anything. one or two might have slowconnections but all five?""it isn't just the up ratio. i get zeros across the board. iget a utorrent client. i see how much i'm giving to themthen i see a bank of zeros against up, overall, from, up,down, stat up.""if i do ban 'em they still get to leech the file offothers. i pruned it down to just five azureus and onemainline user and the seeding flew along with very littleoverhead. about 6%. great for me since i have to watch myusage share. but like you say, it's my choice just as it'sother people's choice to use bitcomet or bitlord orwhatever. if utorrent doesn't report anything but a wholebank of zeros, i don't trust it. so it's gone." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.