Jump to content

DL speed throttling UL speed?


Trendle

Recommended Posts

Hey all. :cool:

I have this weird issue... My download speed is throttling my upload speed. The ammount of throttle seems to be somewhat proportional to the ammount of DL speed. Here are some graphs to illustrate what I'm talking about:

[see post #15 for more detailed graphs]

2e2ma1s.png

98ghfb.png

Limiting download speed makes upload speed drop, as demonstrated here:

1zg99bl.png

I'm using 3.3.2-30067. I did experience similar behavior with the 3.4 alpha. I'm not going to try 3.3.1 because it works awful for me (for whatever reason).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay let's see a screen shot of Preferences -> Bandwidth.

uTorrent version AND build?

And how are you "throttling" the download speed?

I'm not throttling the DL speed. DL speed throttles UL speed.

I used the Azureus calc for my bandwidth settings, based on 522kBps UL speed.

sqqquv.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not throttling the DL speed. DL speed throttles UL speed.

So probably all that is happening' date=' is that peers are disconnecting or not requesting/sending pieces, and if they disconnect both upload AND dowmload drop at the same time.[/quote']

My DL doesn't drop. Please, see the graphs on the OP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My DL doesn't drop

So what is your query?????

The fact that rates can and do vary almost in sync on a peer to peer network' date=' where both rates depend on the other peers not your client?[/quote']

Not sure if serious or trolling? What is it about the issue you don't understand? Have you read the whole OP and seen the graphs carefully?

On the other hand, maybe you just can't help me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe if your screenshots weren't minuscule there might be a better chance of seeing what you do. The pastel colours are bad enough to see anyway without reducing the image size as well.

However.

By "limiting download 'speed' you actually mean "setting an maximum download rate, and if that is the case, getting a screenshot of "Upload and Download" so the point where the rate limits are changed could be seen and therefore make a correlation of the changes is evident

All your graphs show is that at some point the upload speed drops off, and with no reference point on the graph for what the max rate is set to at the point it drops away , the graph is just a bunch 'jaggy' lines overlaying a grid showing what we already know, and that is that BitTorrent is NOT a constant rate protocol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe if your screenshots weren't minuscule there might be a better chance of seeing what you do. The pastel colours are bad enough to see anyway without reducing the image size as well.

Right click -> Open image in new tab.

It's the forum that makes them that size. The SS's are large enough.

However.

By "limiting download 'speed' you actually mean "setting an maximum download rate, and if that is the case, getting a screenshot of "Upload and Download" so the point where the rate limits are changed could be seen and therefore make a correlation of the changes is evident

All your graphs show is that at some point the upload speed drops off, and with no reference point on the graph for what the max rate is set to at the point it drops away , the graph is just a bunch 'jaggy' lines overlaying a grid showing what we already know, and that is that BitTorrent is NOT a constant rate protocol.

The graphs are very clear in indicating the following pattern: Download speed throttles upload speed. Yes, BitTorrent is P2P, but you're naive if you think you can't get constant rates with P2P. In this case, there's no chance whatsoever that the drops in UL speed are caused by the P2P network itself... it's caused by the increase in DL speed, and again, this can be seen in the graphs.

The graphs show no set bandwidth limit, the only exception being the 4MBps part, which I indicated. UL speed is always unlimited in all the graphs. I did test setting a limit for the UL speed, specifically to 460kBps. This made the UL speed unable to go past 240kBps. Immediately setting it to unlimited afterwards made it go up to ~350kBps, which is the rate that I get when my DL speed is maxed out (4.9-5MBps).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The graphs show no set bandwidth limit, the only exception being the 4MBps part, which I indicated. UL speed is always unlimited in all the graphs. I did test setting a limit for the UL speed, specifically to 460kBps. This made the UL speed unable to go past 240kBps. Immediately setting it to unlimited afterwards made it go up to ~350kBps, which is the rate that I get when my DL speed is maxed out (4.9-5MBps).
Maybe but we cannot see evidence of, we only have your supposition or deductions, there is no verification that the upload speed dropped off at the same point as the download limit changed, without having reference points on the graph, it is simply a coincedence.

This is a graph from 3.3.1.30017

limit-changed.png

And it shows nothing like what you are describing.

If I applied deductive reasoning to that graph, I could assume that setting a download limit caused an INCREASE it the speeds the client was achieving.

PROOF of a correlation is required not an opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I should've taken screenshots of both the UL & DL graph, but I did the annotations on the graphs to show the points where the speed changes. It is no coincidence, the points I marked are accurate.

But it's obvious you won't take my word for it, so I will take new screenshots that show both the UL & DL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, time to play some Natural Selection 2 and stop worrying, I guess. :rolleyes:

I don't really understand the concept of DL increment = UL decrease, but if you say it's like that I believe it. :lol: At least now I know it isn't my ISP screwing me over or bad network configuration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...