theWalrus Posted December 3, 2005 Report Share Posted December 3, 2005 To help manage the list as it grows when more torrents are added and current torrents are left in the list to seed, I propose allowing torrents to be grouped. Also to have those groups be collapsable. Here is a representation of what I believe would be awesome. No other client I have used has ever allowed it.Anyway, my proposed feature (linked for size):Group - ExpandedGroup - Collapsed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted December 4, 2005 Report Share Posted December 4, 2005 Believe it or not, someone came up with a similar idea as yours a while ago ;P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theWalrus Posted December 4, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 4, 2005 Damn, I searched first and only found topics about different ideas using the same words. Well I still am suggesting it anyway, so now it's been suggested twice and that means it's a really good idea, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomZ Posted December 4, 2005 Report Share Posted December 4, 2005 I suggest the ability to collapse torrents based on their "label" in IRC. But ludde wasn't around, so didn't get a comment. I think it would be awesome and makes life easier for people who have alot of torrents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScubaSteve Posted December 4, 2005 Report Share Posted December 4, 2005 sounds like a good idea, im all for it as it will certainly help with my tv series episodes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadowfax Posted December 4, 2005 Report Share Posted December 4, 2005 I like this idea, I have literally dozens of torrents that I monitor for seed requirements at any given time, so being able to add torrents into groups would be great, since I don't really want to see those torrents 24/7. Specifically, being able to create and label a group in any way, drag-and-drop the torrent into the group (or use a menu object, such as 'Move to group..' if necessary) and even being able to put a group within a group (Seed Watch > TV Series > Rome, etc.) would clean up my list quite a bit.Hopefully this will get picked up -Edit-Being able to set faster refreshes such as 250ms and 125 would be great too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted December 4, 2005 Report Share Posted December 4, 2005 Why? It's not like download/upload speed refreshes any faster than every 1000ms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted December 4, 2005 Report Share Posted December 4, 2005 Sounds like all that (faster refreshing) would do is eat more CPU cycles =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjobo Posted December 4, 2005 Report Share Posted December 4, 2005 Good Idea!, Add to the featurelist page..Only problem is that i think ludde will have a hard time to implement becuase it will require some advanced/complicated programming, and I think he have to redo alot of ui-codebase to make it possible to implement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NiteShdw Posted December 5, 2005 Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 This feature has already been requested on the Feature Request pageTopic: http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=2448 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaosblade Posted December 8, 2005 Report Share Posted December 8, 2005 I really dislike the category based UIs.Also, tjobo is quite right. Assuming that ludde uses native win32 controls, and the normal ones do NOT have categories or similar methods (listviews exist, but they do not work in the same way, and i dont think they have columns at all) it means rewriting the complete interface elements, something i wouldn't even poke at. Implenemting one's own controls can be tricky especially with this kinda feature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torro Posted December 28, 2005 Report Share Posted December 28, 2005 it means rewriting the complete interface elements, something i wouldn't even poke at. Implenemting one's own controls can be tricky especially with this kinda feature.At this moment, all torrents are displayed in a single window. Maybe multiple vertically stacked windows can be shown. Every group gets it's own window. +---------------------------------+| Window for group 1 torrents |+---------------------------------+| Window for group 2 torrents |+---------------------------------+| Window for group 3 torrents |+---------------------------------+etc.Now the individual windows can be shown, minimized or whatever default interface element is available.Just my 2 cents . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted December 28, 2005 Report Share Posted December 28, 2005 Erm, that's going to meet with a lot of opposition (and is a lot more messy/busy than simple collapsible groups). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.