shaked Posted December 2, 2006 Report Share Posted December 2, 2006 Allow set priority to the first X MB of the file So you will able to see mpeg and avi movies before it's complete downloading!! (like in kazaa lite K++) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wipeyourfeet Posted February 23, 2007 Report Share Posted February 23, 2007 That would actually be cool like being able to set specific ranges for the pieces of file to be DL'ed first by making diffrent blocks to be prioritized kick @#$ idea!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spartakus Posted February 23, 2007 Report Share Posted February 23, 2007 How about making the voting page up and running again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted February 23, 2007 Report Share Posted February 23, 2007 I'm not even sure it was actually looked at by ludde before... And many people never bothered looking at that page either, judging by all the dupe requests ;\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjobo Posted April 12, 2007 Report Share Posted April 12, 2007 Yea.. But it was good as reference to the forum. You got a good overview to check without searching the forum. Also you usually get the request described in one sentence, which also save a lot of time.Hope the database is still intact, I would gladly host it on my server. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NiteShdw Posted April 23, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 23, 2007 The site is back up. I took it down due to hosting problems and security/design flaws. I'll work on modifying it to use AJAX for voting and tighten up security. Until then, you can still enjoy the feature request page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted April 23, 2007 Report Share Posted April 23, 2007 Ah, it's back... Thanks NiteShdw What would be great is if the page got some form of organization by categories or something, as things got (IMHO) pretty unmanageable in the list. In terms of design, perhaps some more whitespace should be used, as things looked very cramped (even a simple change to the cell paddings might do fine ).*Restickified* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NiteShdw Posted April 24, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 24, 2007 Can you suggest a list of categories to include?And thanks for the sticky :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted April 24, 2007 Report Share Posted April 24, 2007 Mm... the easiest one would be to stick all the user interface design suggestions into... User Interface Design As for the others, I'm not entirely sure yet, but I'll try to think of something if/when I have more time to look through the list Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjobo Posted April 24, 2007 Report Share Posted April 24, 2007 NiteShdw: I see you suddenly woke up... how come? I suggest these categories:* User interface / GUI * Network* Advanced options/features* Lightweight features/tweaks* Implemented featuresAlso consider removig: "Unlikely to be implemented" since there is new developers.Also you can update the "Implemented" status for features that have been added.Also remove all feature request that has been trashed and locked since you cant discuss them anymore.Also fix so you can't direct link to vote yes/no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NiteShdw Posted April 26, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 Originally, a uTorrent moderator had access to set the Good Feature/Bad Feature setting and have access to moderate (delete/edit) feature suggestions. I am still willing to provide a moderator with that access. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 I would do it, but moderating feature requests is very far from my cup of tea... If given access, I might try, but I seriously doubt I'd be able to last long moderating requests xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NiteShdw Posted April 26, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 I was going to send you a PM, but I don't see the option anywhere...Anyway, my feature request list actually doesn't get that many new feature requests. There's only been one in the last two days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted April 27, 2007 Report Share Posted April 27, 2007 [sNIP] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted April 27, 2007 Report Share Posted April 27, 2007 I was the one who had access to that originally, I think XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shkbobo Posted May 5, 2007 Report Share Posted May 5, 2007 Move the implemented features to the bottom of the list.They're kind of pointless to see and should only be there for reference purposes, so having them at the end would be best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeadMan Posted May 11, 2007 Report Share Posted May 11, 2007 Auto recheck on completion is SORELY needed. Whenever my networked drive is disconnected (Either by accident on rebooting without stopping uTorrent or by a system crash) uTorrent completes torrents with corrupted parts and I am forced to do a manual recheck. This is not a hardware issue per se. I have tried it on other networked drives on different PC's and it always does it. So anyone throwing around hardware/drivers as being the problem is fooling themselves in this respect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted May 12, 2007 Report Share Posted May 12, 2007 It's your hardware. I torrented HUNDREDS of gigabytes onto a network drive at home and not a single byte ever was corrupted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeadMan Posted May 13, 2007 Report Share Posted May 13, 2007 Well even if it is my hardware having an 'option' I can click on that performs a filehash before moving to another folder would be of great use rather than having to manually force a recheck of every file after it's downloaded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ehwavrell Posted June 21, 2007 Report Share Posted June 21, 2007 russboss (from prev thread), your request is an interesting one, but I would modify it with the option to disable the sync feature as this seems unnecessary and counterintuitive if your goal is to increase performance, assuming you have enough bandwidth (like 1/2 megabytes/sec each way), 1/2 gigs of 3200/4200 ddr2 ram and a decent dual/quad core processor then disk cache and rpm might be a problem for you. I suggest a hybrid hard drive (with a gig of cache), or just setting it to move completed files to the second drive so it will seed from one and dl from the system drive. however your feature would work better if dling to the storage/secondary drive and seeding from the system drive if you're doing more dling than uling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjobo Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 wrong.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted June 27, 2007 Report Share Posted June 27, 2007 "Wrong thread" would be the phrase. This thread is NOT an alternative for the one DWK locked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honeyfrog Posted June 27, 2007 Report Share Posted June 27, 2007 Replies to several:Also fix so you can't direct link to vote yes/no.Oh no you don't; leave that alone. The whole purpose of such a thing is to enable people to vote. The consensus majority of people inclined to vote may be and often is wrong (i.e., *cough* Wikipedia *cough*), but making it easy to vote at least enables developers to note which issues people are most concerned with.Auto recheck on completion is SORELY needed.It's your hardware. I torrented HUNDREDS of gigabytes onto a network drive at home and not a single byte ever was corrupted.I'm with the first guy; it's needed (if not necessarily "SORELY"). I've encountered corrupted blocks for reasons that have nothing to do with network drives crashing (and even then, what's not to like about a software which helps a user get the most from marginal hardware?). At the very least, there should be an advanced settings flag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.