DreadWingKnight Posted September 4, 2008 Report Share Posted September 4, 2008 I dont have time to debug for you so dont expect me putting process list or anythingIf you are unwilling to provide the information we request to troubleshoot, don't expect us to be able to truly fix the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pYjamas Posted September 4, 2008 Report Share Posted September 4, 2008 i've never had a memoryleak-issue with any utorrent version in either xp 32bit or vista 64bit. get broadband, 10 or 100 mbit and no router and your all set to go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resonance Posted September 4, 2008 Report Share Posted September 4, 2008 No, disabling the caching settings fixed it for the rest of us on x64 vista. Dunno what changed from 1.7.x to 1.8, but whatever did was naughty! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tcharp Posted September 4, 2008 Report Share Posted September 4, 2008 It certainly seems to have fixed (or at least stopped) the problem on my Vista x64 setup.TC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted September 6, 2008 Report Share Posted September 6, 2008 It is a problem with Vista, just because the system cache is badly implemented and it pages stuff to disk. The issue is that the bypass doesn't always work on Vista.The utorrent process isn't eating RAM, so there's no memory leak in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oakim Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 When 1.8 was only beta i hadn't this problem but when it got stable the memory started getting spiked I was gettin the error that the hard drive was overloaded or something like that. when that error did show it would stop dl and i couldn't restart utorrent I was forced to restart the whole computer to make it go away. setting the cache maual only prospone the problem and getting the memory to spike. When i looked at utorrent in the process list it could get as high as I set the cach to and got stuck there and the same time utorrent would say "disk 100% overloaded" It seams like it wouldnt write anyting to the disk.I'm running on a Intel C2D E6850 CPu and a Gigabyte P35-DS4 motherboard with 4Gb of ram and Vista 32 bit. I have downgraded to 1.7.7 and don't have this problem anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreadWingKnight Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 And what about the windows disk cache bypass options in 1.8? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oakim Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 Sorry didnt type that. Ive read the entire post and disabled them, not effect at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreadWingKnight Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 So the two options are checked or unchecked? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oakim Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 Checked, sorry for my bad english I love uTorrent and wether it's a windows problem och uTorrent I would only wish to get this sorted out and keep using the best torrent program ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted September 8, 2008 Report Share Posted September 8, 2008 So the two options are checked or unchecked? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oakim Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 The two options where checked so windows cache was disabled. I don't use 1.8 anymore because of this problem, thats why i typed where. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreadWingKnight Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 Then your issue is likely different.Is it actually the uTorrent process leaking memory for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oakim Posted September 10, 2008 Report Share Posted September 10, 2008 Jupp. if i use 1.8 and dl och ul som files utorrent says "disk overload 100 %" and if i set the cache manually to a large amount like 256MB the disk problem is solved until the cache has taken all the 256Mb of ram and then displays the message "disk overload 100 %" again. it never writes the cache to the discs it seams. if i tries to retart utorrent when it has the disc message it freeze and does nothing. With 1.7.7 I dont have these problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreadWingKnight Posted September 10, 2008 Report Share Posted September 10, 2008 Then your issue is not the same. Don't thread hijack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perza Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 Well, had the same issues with memory usage going only up on Vista x64, 10/786 Mb connection, I tried disabling windows caching of disk writes but it didn't help so now I'm back on version 1.7.7 which is working without problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Rebrovskiy Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 http://www.uwe-sieber.de/ntcacheset_e.htmlandhttp://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa965240(VS.85).aspxEverybody can set the System File Cache of Vista x86, x64 and WinXP x86 and x64 manually with the function SetSystemFileCacheSize. Make the bat-file and put it to the autorun-folder. So, Vista never use more free ram for the file cache than you let it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 Doesn't really work though, in my experience. It only trims it temporarily, but it'll grow again with no real limit.By the way, you shouldn't care about your RAM being used unless your system is actually slowing down. By default, Vista uses as much RAM as possible to cache apps/files (such as with the prefetcher), as there's no point in having RAM going unused. This goes for you, perza, and everyone else in this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perza Posted September 16, 2008 Report Share Posted September 16, 2008 Well in my case the observation of memory usage is like this: When I used 1.8.1 version of utorrent it went from 30% used memory (standard usage on my rig with 4GB of RAM, no apps running) to 70% or 90% of used memory and it stays there as long as I have utorrent running. Disk cache options in utorrent preferences were on default I only disabled windows caching of disk writes. Then I installed 1.7.7. and memory usage went from 30% to 40% and at some passed time back to 30% and so on. It means that 1.7.7 version is freeing memory as it should. There is definitely something different as far as the memory management goes in these two versions. As far as the prefetch function in Vista, I think that is one of the best things in this OS but I don't like that one thing uses 2/3 of my memory especially a torrent client. I'll stick to the 1.7.7. version which suits and works just fine. Cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreadWingKnight Posted September 16, 2008 Report Share Posted September 16, 2008 Perza, your "troubleshooting" doesn't actually help us solve the problem.Unless you people are willing to help, the issue WILL STILL BE THERE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Hazel Posted September 16, 2008 Report Share Posted September 16, 2008 Disable caching of Windows reads -and- writes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frostvang Posted September 16, 2008 Report Share Posted September 16, 2008 I had the same issue as described in the original post, where I would have like 90-95% of my memory taken by uTorrent after a couple of hours seeding. I easily solved it by disabling both "Windows caching of disk read/write", now everything runs as it should and I'm happily hitting my 80 Mbit again without clogging up my memory. OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x64RAM: 4GB of DDR2 RAMHDD: Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB 32MB CacheJust thought I'd let you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Perza: if it's not the utorrent process eating the RAM, it's Windows. Windows is simply making use of FREE RAM on your system to cache. Stop being so anal about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oakim Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 firon: Perza has the same problem i had when i used i.8 and its Utorrent thats eats up all the memory not windows. i saw it in taskmanagement and when I tried to shut it down it wouldent so i had to shut down the whole computer to force it to shut down.Whe are not anal about it as you so nicely put it but users that arent happy that the favorite torrent program has a bug in the latest version.i have read about this problem in quite some threads now and the one comon thing I have found is that you (utorrent dev. peaple) are quick to blame Windows. It may be both program but the fact is that the problem is solved if you go back to version 1.7.7 of utorrent.Note. im not angry on anybody just inputting some thoughts. Cant you check what you altered from 1.7.7 to 1.8? By the way. when 1.8 was beta i didnt have this problem, I had another problem and that was that utorrent crashed alot so I whent back to 1.7.7 and installed 1.8 again when it became stable just to getting another problem. so back again to 1.7.7cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Hazel Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 How quickly can you reproduce this problem?If you could cause it again, go to the Logger tab, right click and choose "Log to file...", select a file name, then right click on the Logger tab again and choose "Dump Memory Info" then send me that log file. Also let me know how much memory uTorrent was using. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.