leadspectre Posted July 8, 2015 Report Share Posted July 8, 2015 Current Stable ReleaseLast Updated: Jul 07, 2015 01:02PM PDT2015-07-07: Version 3.4.3 (build 40633) Stable "Wrong tab content" fixTab selection persistence fixuser feedback icon in upper rightDHT fixesSuppress "Do you want to make uTorrent the default..." message on client updateFix content overflow problem that was hiding the bottom lines of the tab windows in Torrents viewGeneral trial streaming UI fixesDownload this version here. µTorrent Stable(3.4.3 build 40633)For Windows (1.9 MB)English (US) - June 26, 2015Release NotesDownload Language PackDownload Now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryrynz Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 So is it final yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 There is only one thing that is *final*, and it is usually berried 6 feet under... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryrynz Posted July 10, 2015 Report Share Posted July 10, 2015 3.4.4 is in beta... Never thought I'd see the day when the uTorrent team actually decided to willingly change version numbers rather than just build numbers.This would have to be the shortest development cycle for a release since Bittorrent Inc bought out uTorrent... Holy shit, it's almost like they have a plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onmyouza Posted July 16, 2015 Report Share Posted July 16, 2015 µTorrent Stable(3.4.3 build 40760)For Windows (1.9 MB)English (US) - July 11, 2015 No release notes yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryrynz Posted July 16, 2015 Report Share Posted July 16, 2015 That is interesting, considering the build number it looks like most or all of 3.4.4 got backported to 3.4.3?The orange upgrade button from 3.4.4 isn't there.. What's going on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted July 16, 2015 Report Share Posted July 16, 2015 The orange upgrade button from 3.4.4 isn't there..Increment in build # does not mean it has everything from the previous build #... Probably some bug fix to 3.4.3 40633... and since this button is a "GUI improvement" to 3.4.4 , it's not there... So, I guess until they'll fix it in 6.4.4, we can all use 3.4.3.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike20021969 Posted July 16, 2015 Report Share Posted July 16, 2015 µTorrent Stable(3.4.3 build 40760)For Windows (1.9 MB)English (US) - July 11, 2015 No release notes yet. Previous version (3.4.3.40633) is still being served up on download link(s)... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conquerist Posted July 16, 2015 Report Share Posted July 16, 2015 build is now actually being served... 2015-07-16: Version 3.4.3 (build 40760) Stable minor statistics fix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryrynz Posted July 17, 2015 Report Share Posted July 17, 2015 Increment in build # does not mean it has everything from the previous build #... Probably some bug fix to 3.4.3 40633... and since this button is a "GUI improvement" to 3.4.4 , it's not there... So, I guess until they'll fix it in 6.4.4, we can all use 3.4.3....I know that, but why even have the build number similar to 3.4.4? Why not just +1 on to it from the last stable build if it's just a statistics fix..still a strange development system if you ask me.The build numbers for 3.4.3 shouldn't overlap with 3.4.4, but that would make sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted July 17, 2015 Report Share Posted July 17, 2015 Just leave it be. It's the version control system they have that manages those numbers, and until you know which one the devs are using - it makes no sense to make guesses about build numbers... It simply seems that tracks 3.4.3/3.4.4 + changes, and build simply # are not related... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
talkingprawn Posted July 17, 2015 Report Share Posted July 17, 2015 That is interesting, considering the build number it looks like most or all of 3.4.4 got backported to 3.4.3?The orange upgrade button from 3.4.4 isn't there.. What's going on? Just leave it be. It's the version control system they have that manages those numbers, and until you know which one the devs are using - it makes no sense to make guesses about build numbers... It simply seems that tracks 3.4.3/3.4.4 + changes, and build simply # are not related... Thanks, and Rafi that's correct. The build numbers represent the order in which builds are made. A build number is only used once and they're sequential. If we built 3.3 right now, the build number would be the one next in line. Might seem weird in some ways, but it does have real benefits. The versioning should represent a feature set -- pardon any future departures from that but this is the intent. So Ryrynz this updated stable release is on the 3.4.3 line (the end of the 3.4.3 line) and the orange button is in the 3.4.4 line. 3.4.4 is currently in beta, and future versions will contain the same feature set and will be fixes to previous issues. They *should* also contain any updates to stable (such as this 3.4.3 update) that happen in the meantime. That will then go into stable, and at that point will definitely contain any such updates. Then 3.4.5 goes into beta, etc. It will be possible to have multiple betas out, with different version numbers representing the different lines. We will have one of those soon, but it shouldn't be common at all. The intent of course is to give some predictability to what features are in what beta/stable. Once we cut a beta the features are more or less locked, and updates to that line should only be bug fixes to that feature set. The previous way of doing things had many simultaneous betas with wildly different and intersecting feature sets, bug fixes went into future betas with even different features. Yes it was very confusing and made quality control difficult. This will slow that down a bit, make it more predictable, and I hope increase the quality of the releases we put out. Thanks for your help in all that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BMW-X7 Posted July 18, 2015 Report Share Posted July 18, 2015 Thanks, and Rafi that's correct. The build numbers represent the order in which builds are made. A build number is only used once and they're sequential. If we built 3.3 right now, the build number would be the one next in line. Might seem weird in some ways, but it does have real benefits. The versioning should represent a feature set -- pardon any future departures from that but this is the intent. So Ryrynz this updated stable release is on the 3.4.3 line (the end of the 3.4.3 line) and the orange button is in the 3.4.4 line. 3.4.4 is currently in beta, and future versions will contain the same feature set and will be fixes to previous issues. They *should* also contain any updates to stable (such as this 3.4.3 update) that happen in the meantime. That will then go into stable, and at that point will definitely contain any such updates. Then 3.4.5 goes into beta, etc. It will be possible to have multiple betas out, with different version numbers representing the different lines. We will have one of those soon, but it shouldn't be common at all. The intent of course is to give some predictability to what features are in what beta/stable. Once we cut a beta the features are more or less locked, and updates to that line should only be bug fixes to that feature set. The previous way of doing things had many simultaneous betas with wildly different and intersecting feature sets, bug fixes went into future betas with even different features. Yes it was very confusing and made quality control difficult. This will slow that down a bit, make it more predictable, and I hope increase the quality of the releases we put out. Thanks for your help in all that. Hey talkingprawn when are you gonna to fix rating bug. In every torrent , it is showing 0 Rating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryrynz Posted July 18, 2015 Report Share Posted July 18, 2015 Just leave it be. It's the version control system they have that manages those numbers, and until you know which one the devs are using - it makes no sense to make guesses about build numbers... It simply seems that tracks 3.4.3/3.4.4 + changes, and build simply # are not related... Doesn't hurt to make guesses if these guesses are posed in the form of a question.. so no, if something seems out of place I'll always bring it up.Also doesn't help that no change log is provided on release (Is this ever going to change?) Thanks, and Rafi that's correct. The build numbers represent the order in which builds are made. A build number is only used once and they're sequential. If we built 3.3 right now, the build number would be the one next in line. Might seem weird in some ways, but it does have real benefits. The versioning should represent a feature set -- pardon any future departures from that but this is the intent. So Ryrynz this updated stable release is on the 3.4.3 line (the end of the 3.4.3 line) and the orange button is in the 3.4.4 line. 3.4.4 is currently in beta, and future versions will contain the same feature set and will be fixes to previous issues. They *should* also contain any updates to stable (such as this 3.4.3 update) that happen in the meantime. That will then go into stable, and at that point will definitely contain any such updates. Then 3.4.5 goes into beta, etc. It will be possible to have multiple betas out, with different version numbers representing the different lines. We will have one of those soon, but it shouldn't be common at all. Automatic versioning system, sequential build numbers.. got it.Not a fan of multiple betas. If you have enough time to make multiple branches then you have time to test and release.Try not to make a mess.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddlang Posted August 10, 2015 Report Share Posted August 10, 2015 Any news on a fix for the extension bug? Build 40760 still has it. EDIT: This behavior has been improved a lot since previous builds, though. Back then stopping the torrent didn't help. It does now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted August 10, 2015 Report Share Posted August 10, 2015 Any news on a fix for the extension bug? Build 40760 still has it.What was this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddlang Posted August 10, 2015 Report Share Posted August 10, 2015 What was this?http://forum.utorrent.com/topic/95072-utorrent-does-not-always-rename-ut-files-v342-build-38913/?p=505995 It still happens when some files are skipped. The difference is that with build 40760, the workaround is to simply pause the torrent. It causes utorrent to properly remove the .!ut extension from the completed files. It's still bothersome though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted August 10, 2015 Report Share Posted August 10, 2015 k, will comment in that thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conquerist Posted August 12, 2015 Report Share Posted August 12, 2015 µTorrent Stable(3.4.3 build 40907)For Windows (1.62 MB)English (US) - August 7, 2015No release notes yet. [edit]and it's gone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
talkingprawn Posted August 12, 2015 Report Share Posted August 12, 2015 No release notes yet. [edit]and it's gone Sorry about that -- temporary download-only release of a build identical to the official release 40760. Reverted back to 40760. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike20021969 Posted August 13, 2015 Report Share Posted August 13, 2015 build identical to the official release 40760Something is different...3.4.3.40760 = 1.90 MB (1,996,896 bytes)3.4.3.40907 = 1.61 MB (1,697,376 bytes) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted August 13, 2015 Report Share Posted August 13, 2015 Probably ads... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vze2mp9g Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 Probably ads... What happenned to the developers? They haven't released anything new lately. I still have 3.4.4.40854.Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike20021969 Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 They haven't released anything new lately. I still have 3.4.4.40854. Are you finding any problems with 3.4.4.40854? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 Except for those on my list? No... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.