rafi Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=49813&p=1Outgoing uTP (connection initiation) as I understand it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ver Greeneyes Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Aah, I see. Testing with it set to 5 right now for the sake of my sanity - my router really seems to hate UDP traffic.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fadeout Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 The new build seems to work now with default settings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zhong881209 Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 now many of the people using modem / router that have small UDP pinhole table, as it overflow it might crash or etc.by arvidThe reason why this is a new problem in uTorrent 1.9 is because it uses uTP (which is a transport on top of UDP), you can disable this by setting the bt.transp_disposition to 13. (13 means, allow incoming TCP and uTP connections, but only make outgoing TCP connections).now i using bt.transp_disposition "13" and use low global max connection, as it rarely crash now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mighty Buzzard Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 955 bob 20 0 349m 155m 25m S 0.0 7.7 143:32.88 firefox-bin 9421 root 20 0 126m 62m 23m R 5.3 3.1 348:55.82 Xorg 10058 bob 20 0 2607m 436m 18m S 1.0 21.5 14:49.58 uTorrent.exeBuild 14809, wine-1.1.17. The memory leak is for sure solved in Windows? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Choi Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 Fadeout: were you having upload issues in the previous betas? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
polian Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Confirmed, 14809 fixed my upload issues with bt.transp_disposition=13.Curious, what was the fix?I'm starting testing with 15. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
callous Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Newest version doesnt fix it for me for issue of slow and falling upload speeds, and bt.transp_disposition is at default, which shows 13. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
polian Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 bt.transp_disposition at 13 works great with 14809.With bt.transp_disposition set at 15 I get a lot of uTP connections established, but upload drops way off still.This may be coincidence, but I did notice that eventually my upload did increase to my full allotment, but the peers I were uploading to were all non-uT clients (no uTP connection). If a uTP connected client worked its way in to get sent a piece (U flag), the upload speed would tank for all peers until the uTP peer gets choked (u flag) again.My router is a D-Link DGL-4300. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted March 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 So at least 13 works well now?That's good to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaosu Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 Not here.I have been trying different numbers and nothing but 15 works. Unfortunately with 15 I'm getting minimal download speed and no upload. I have been trying with lasttwo betas and with going back to last stable but I couldn't get that wroking agian. In last few days I realized I am addicted to torrents : / Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
polian Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 Yeah, it's working great for me at 13.@Chaosu - Sounds like 15 isn't working for you...I'm curious... What does it do at 13? 5?I also found it necessary to stop all my torrents (to initiate the new connections) after changing bt.transp_disposition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fadeout Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 There is something wrong with this build.The client reports CRAZY speeds, capping completely the connection I have (I see an average above 750k sometimes, and that's a 7M adsl line). The problem is that even the upload is constant and capped at 40, while I know that I wouldn't be able to keep 40kb in upload if I maximize my download like that.In fact my netspeed monitor shows that the download is indeed 750k, but the upload goes between 18k and 20k, exactly like it should realistically be. So utorrent is at least reporting upload speed incorrectly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zdnko Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 Yes, it works fine (no upload drops) with bt.transp_disposition at 13 but no uTP connections.With 15 works well too but upload is not so stable and a little lower.bye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osm0sis Posted March 28, 2009 Report Share Posted March 28, 2009 Hmm.. here's something I've never seen before:[2009-03-28 20:16:08] QoS: running low (0.0 kB @ 0.0 kB), stepping up to 0.0 kB [ qos_rate: 0.0 kB bwc rate: 0.0 kB][2009-03-28 20:16:09] QoS: running low (29.2 kB @ 28.3 kB), stepping up to 0.9 kB [ qos_rate: 0.0 kB bwc rate: 28.4 kB][2009-03-28 20:16:10] QoS: running low (497.6 kB @ 497.6 kB), stepping up to 0.9 kB [ qos_rate: 0.0 kB bwc rate: 497.6 kB][2009-03-28 20:16:11] QoS: running low (151.2 kB @ 151.2 kB), stepping up to 0.9 kB [ qos_rate: 0.0 kB bwc rate: 151.9 kB][2009-03-28 20:16:12] QoS: running low (263.4 kB @ 255.5 kB), stepping up to 0.9 kB [ qos_rate: 0.0 kB bwc rate: 255.7 kB][2009-03-28 20:16:13] QoS: running low (263.4 kB @ 255.5 kB), stepping up to 0.9 kB [ qos_rate: 0.0 kB bwc rate: 308.8 kB]What does it all mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaim7890 Posted March 29, 2009 Report Share Posted March 29, 2009 Deleted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phcole Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 Does 1.8.3 beta support UDP tracker, or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Switeck Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 Even if official rules for UDP trackers get codified...it will probably be longer before many trackers start converting to that format. Which means even if uTorrent supported official UDP tracker rules it couldn't use them at first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
callous Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 I found a pretty big bug with 1.83 and 1.82 (both latest versions incl. betas).I put in a port I wish to use in uT (say 61555), have disabled upnp and nat-pmp, my router indicates that uT will use port 61555 and will attempt many random ports as well.The net result according to my tomato 1.23 firmware's QOS graph, is that uT is now doing perhaps 60% of my upload bandwidth on some random ports (there are a whole bunch of them), and 40% on port 61555. This kills any QOS on the router since most QOS implementation depends on the source port you put in and expects the application to abide by the port chosen. uT 1.9.1x DOESNT have this bug. Can someone please look into this?In case you're wondering, yes my port is properly fowarded - I get a green arrow on bottom of uT. This issue only occurs for 1.82 and 1.83 but not for 1.9x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arvid Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 @callous:outgoing connections are not bound to the listen port. You can set the net.outgoing_port and net.outgoing_max_port to specify a range of ports to bind outgoing sockets to. If this is not what you're talking about, I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
callous Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 It looks like i have hole in my understanding of how uT works - my apologies.1.9x seems to have outgoing connections on the listening port only though. That part I am confused about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreadWingKnight Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 uTP traffic maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
callous Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Ok I set used net.outbound_port=51555 and net.outbound_max_port=51561. uT is still sending out my upload data on the listening port on 52555.What am i doing wrong here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreadWingKnight Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Connections, once established, handle traffic in both directions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.