Guest Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 This was my first update. My favorite part was how it said that there was an update, I let it install, it shut down—unexpectedly, it should give a warning—then started up again a few seconds later with the new version. Nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mehralsmensch Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 You're on an old version mehral, the newest is build 364...I realize that... build 360 is the last build that works for me. Anything newer does not find any seeds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 What exactly happens when you run build 364?Does it say Listen error, NAT Error, Network OK, or nothing in the status bar?Is DHT on? You behind a router? What does tracker status say? Is it showing a No Entry sign? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mehralsmensch Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 Never mind. I rebooted and it works flawlessly. I haven't had to do that in a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chazwazza Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 Well, works like a charm for me. By far the best bittorrent client EVER! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kid41212003 Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 i never got a bug or a crash in any version ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 great Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudeboyz Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 So far version 1.3 (build 364) is working fine on my Windows XP SP1 and Windows 98 SE machines. I am downloading and seeding torrents with no apparent instability issues. I'm very pleased.I hope Utorrent stays lean and clean without adding tons of bloated features. I pretty much like it just the way it is. Thanks to the programmers and supporters. I really do like Utorrent the best now - even better than Bit Spirit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuncaCeleste Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 Plz fix the multiple instance problem (when opening the .torrent either from firefox or explorer)Other than that, this proggy is made of win and god Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keithtris Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 Any chance of getting the old availability graph back as an option?I mean, I can sort of see what you're going for with this one; If I'm looking at it right, the dark blues tell me what *most* people have, the light blues tell me what *some* people have and the red bits tell me what *nobody* has.I can see how that could be useful, but I'm behind an ass of a university firewall (which utorrent gets round really well, I might add) and for me it was sort of more useful just to know that there was stuff out there at all, because with this firewall, even though I can see people, I usually don't get anything from them.I dunno, maybe it's just me and this crappy system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudeboyz Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 I don't have that multiple instances problem. Is it a registry thing?Under Windows Integration (in the General Options area) did you try the ASSOCIATE WITH .TORRENT FILES thing? Could it be caused by either not checking it, or clicking on it more than once?Just wonderin'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 We already know what the problem is dudeboyz, seems to be a Unicode-related issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudeboyz Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 see - i'm just a n00b. Unicode is evil... I'm mainly using it on 98 SE so guess I did not see the problem.Good luck fixing it. adding new features can introduce new bugs. hope that instead of adding new features in the next few versions, you just quash the few remaining bugs and enjoy the greatness that is Utorrent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miffo Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 Unicode is evil... Indeed/Me waits for 1.3 bugfix edition 2445 before i upgrade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hin123 Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 I am translating the Traditional Chinese version of µTorrent....The characters '©' and 'µ' cannot be saved properly....Is there any way I can translate the strings containing 'µ' and '©'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noiz Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 I don't know if I'm having the same problem as mehralsmensch but utorrent runs fine for a few hours and then reports a NAT error. None of the previous versions did this so it's quite frustrating.I'm trying a reboot now to see if helps and I'll report back if it doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuncaCeleste Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 The reason, as stated supra, is that some of use have the Non-Unicode thingie set to Japanese (in my case as well as in amonrei's), simply as that. Some (most ) of you guys have it set to English, and don't have the problem at all, whether we do... :/So the reason is already known.. we're just waiting for it to get fixed i'm sure someone from the uTorrent staff is already working on it they are THAT cool .baibai~~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GameSky Posted December 14, 2005 Report Share Posted December 14, 2005 Yeah...this version 1.3 really extremely coolI use private tracker to download...and the speed is...very very fast than previous version ...great work, developer!...well...why don't create an extension for imcomplete download...because I a bit confused which file already downloaded and which not...thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudeboyz Posted December 15, 2005 Report Share Posted December 15, 2005 Hey, what's on tap for 1.4? <GRIN>I'd be totally happy if they just focused on making 1.3 totally bug free for the foreseeable future, actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dAbReAkA Posted December 15, 2005 Report Share Posted December 15, 2005 1.3 crashed yesterday...dunno how did it happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lxwong Posted December 15, 2005 Report Share Posted December 15, 2005 .....and then reports a NAT error. None of the previous versions did this so it's quite frustrating.I'm trying a reboot now to see if helps and I'll report back if it doesn't.I am also seeing this problem of NAT error for the very 1st time with this version of 1.3. Previous versions were fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meltingsmoke Posted December 15, 2005 Report Share Posted December 15, 2005 why don't create an extension for imcomplete download...because I a bit confused which file already downloaded and which not...thanks For what purpose? You can already download the files to one folder, and tell the program to move them to another onces its done, renaming them to copy other programs serve no purpose if you ask me.On mine its setup like thisAll torrents are automaticly saved in:C:\Downloads\In Progress\!Torrents\All downloads are started in:C:\Downloads\In Progress\When a torrent finishes its moved to:C:\Downloads\Finished\!Torrents\When a download finishes its moved to:C:\Downloads\Finished\This is already available to you though existing options in the program, and its a lot easier to seperate them than just renaming the files like other programs do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted December 15, 2005 Report Share Posted December 15, 2005 why don't create an extension for imcomplete download...because I a bit confused which file already downloaded and which not...thanks For what purpose? ...Here is an example-purpose ... - a. When you want to easily move unfinished torrents from another client to uT (example *.BC! ) instead of renaming them, you can just take care of a common extension for both.b. I have setup a script/macro that is being activated on PC startup, checks for unfinished torrents (ones with *.BC! for example) and then activate the client if required. So - it is a plus if you can distinguish between a regular AVI and an unfinished AVI .c. Since they invented 'file extension' just for that - file association - it is only natural to stick to the standard and use a special extension for the unfinished ones (=Torrent 'format' intended to be opened with torrent clients)Does this make any sense to you ? It should be optional so you wouldn't HAVE to use it...this is my 2 cents... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kds.. Posted December 16, 2005 Report Share Posted December 16, 2005 cant u jus modify the script so it checks if the folder is populated or not? also afaik Azureus doesnt do that and if so then it doesnt seem to be a standard that only utorrent doesnt do.. also when u add a new torrent if theres already files it will recheck them and see how complete they.. imo it seems a redundant feature Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted December 16, 2005 Report Share Posted December 16, 2005 cant u jus modify the script so it checks if the folder is populated or not?No, since they are not "moved" but stay mixed with other finished files.also afaik Azureus doesnt do that and if so then it doesnt seem to be a standard that only utorrent doesnt do..I didn't mean "BT standard" but "Windows" standard-convention - having the file extension indicate what application should be used to open it.also when u add a new torrent if theres already files it will recheck them and see how complete they..??? yes, but not if it is with *.BC! extension...imo it seems a redundant featureIMO it is not a feature it is an option. u CAN use it , u don't HAVE to. Seems to me like a useful one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.